Skip to main content

Is Priti Patel's forced resignation yet another sign of the inherent sexism in the British government or is it the ultimate in distraction techniques?

Priti Patel resigned yesterday (Wednesday) bringing the total number of resignations from Prime Minister Theresa May's Cabinet to two in a week. Ms Patel was called back from a trip to Africa to meet with her boss Mrs May last night and given a final hour ultimatum to resign or face being sacked from her position as International Development Secretary.

This came after a week of revelations about the Tory Cabinet member and staunch Brexit supporter, which involved failing to be candid about her dealings in Israel.

It emerged at the beginning of this week that Ms Patel had secretly had a number of meetings with Israeli leaders including the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu whilst on a family holiday back in August, without informing the Foreign Office about her movements.

Ms Patel apologised for her 'over enthusiasm' when confronted by Mrs May and all seemed well until it emerged she had actually covered up several more meetings with Israeli leaders since her return from holiday and had been planning to organise funds to be sent to the Israeli army for humanitarian work in the occupied Golan Heights – a disputed area that the UK does not recognise. Her failure to fully disclose her actions, even when confronted, was her undoing according to government sources. A new Cabinet member will be announced today (Thursday).

The coverage of Ms Patel's misdemeanours has been quite extraordinary and dare I say a little out of proportion. She was treated like the Kim Kardashian of the British government last night. Internet users were privy to live footage of Ms Patel's plane returning to Britain from Africa and the BBC sent a helicopter up to film Ms Patel's car as it journeyed from the airport to Downing Street.

There were paparazzi shots at close range of Ms Patel sitting in the car and informants gave exact timings on Twitter of when Ms Patel entered Number 10 and then exited, six minutes later, by the back gates.

Obviously Ms Patel was underhand in her actions and there has to be something circumspect about the fact she failed to register any of her movements with official sources but don't we the public think that there are far greater sins being committed by other members of Mrs May's government?

Is this simply to do with the white male gaze of the British press who are choosing to focus all their attention on Ms Patel because there is something about watching an intelligent, attractive lady fall from grace or is this a convenient diversion tactic pressed upon Mrs May by her male henchmen to distract from their own transgressions?

I find it hard to view Ms Patel's misdemeanours as anything as serious as Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson's for instance. I don't know if we are missing something as lay people, but the fact Ms Patel failed to carry out what does appear to be 'enthusiastic' work through the proper channels, pales into insignificance when compared to Mr Johnson potentially causing a British citizen, and mother, to serve double her original sentence in an Iranian prison because he failed to get his facts straight.

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and her family have stressed over and over again that she was on holiday in Iran taking her two-year-old daughter to meet her grandparents before her arrest 19 months ago, and not carrying out espionage as the Iranian government believe.

Up until now Boris Johnson, as Foreign Secretary, has failed to give any recognition to Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe's wrongful incarceration and then this week saw him wading in and saying he believed Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe was 'just teaching journalism' out there. A major blunder which could see an extra five years added to Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe's existing five year sentence, as it adds fuel to the idea she was out there working rather than on holiday.

You would have thought this could not possibly be dismissed as yet another of Boris' blunders. Again and again he has tried to appear funny or clever to the detriment of sensitive international affairs and yet Mrs May appears to have no plans to show him the door.

Personally I deem a transgression which directly affects the life of another human being as far greater than a failure to work through the proper channels and so in the same breath consider the myriad of sexual harassment allegations against members of the Tory government far more serious than Ms Patel's behaviour.

There is something unsettling about the fact a woman has been forced to resign from the Cabinet amidst a time in the Government's history which has revealed the extent of the day-to-day suffering of all women working in Westminster.

Granted, the first minister to be forced to resign was a man – Michael Fallon – but if we are talking about proportionality, the number of men in government, and indeed the Cabinet, far out number the women, so if this is an attempt at some kind of belated gender equality then it is failing to wash with me.


Popular posts from this blog

A Bake Off style icon and a feline emblem of women's emancipation

The world of British politics has been dominated by the wave of sexual allegations pouring out of Westminster this week. So much so, there has been hardly any talk of Brexit. Perhaps we have left. Has anyone noticed a lack of hummus on the shelves of Tesco? But I, rather unfeelingly, digress.
MPs across all political parties have received accusations of a sexual nature against them, ranging from inappropriate comments and misplaced hands to sexual assault and rape. Prime Minister Theresa May has pledged to unite with all other party leaders next week to discuss what must be done to clamp down on this behaviour and deal with the current allegations appropriately.
Of course there have been numerous critics - those who believe we are in some way being unfair to male MPs by bringing these sexual transgressions to the fore. That a man will never be able to chat a woman up in a bar again if we persist in allowing yet another male-dominated area of society to be exposed as misogynistic and …

Older women are missing the point when they say millennials need to 'toughen up' in the face of sexual abuse

It takes a certain type of woman to come out during what can only be seen as a revolutionary time for women's rights and complain. But that is exactly what a number of older, prominent female figures have done since the sex scandal broke at Westminster and it leaves me puzzling, in the most colloquial of terms, 'whose side are they actually on'?
The pervasive idea amongst the women I refer to is that what is going on in the House of Commons as we speak is nothing but a moral panic led by the millennials. They claim that it all comes down to the younger women, who make up much of the MP's staff, not being tough enough to fend off the comments and misplaced hands of their bosses.
They further claim this is some kind of 'millennial revenge' by younger women who carry around with them a sense of disgust towards anyone over 40. Furthermore, they say, women of their generation had a far more robust attitude to men behaving badly, compared to the 'fragile' …

MP's vote on Brexit is a 'con', Johnson's apology a sop, but Theresa May's condemnation of Russia was a triumph

It has been called a 'staggering climbdown' by some but the truth of the matter is, the Government's 11th hour decision to allow Parliament a vote on the Brexit deal is just another example of Tory trickery.
David Davis, the Brexit Secretary, announced yesterday (Monday) that the final Brexit Withdrawal Bill would be presented to the House of Commons as an Act of Parliament which could be voted on in good time before we leave the European Union.
This was initially seen as a major victory on the part of Labour MPs and Tory rebels who have been calling for several months for Parliament to have their say on the Brexit deal. Davis had previously said there would not be an opportunity for MPs to vote as they anticipated work on the deal would be going on until the last minute before exiting.
But alas the devil is always in the detail and it quickly emerged that whilst MPs will be able to vote on the deal, they will not be able to have any say in the case of a no deal Brexit – …