Skip to main content

All the women of Westminster are asking for is to go freely about their work

The male reaction to the Westminster sexual harassment scandal has been dispiriting. Men from all corners, whether the press, the public or the male MPs themselves, have managed to demonstrate a complete lack of understanding about what it is women are actually asking for, through a combination of overblown reaction and laughing the whole thing off.

Tory MP Sir Roger Gale declared the House of Commons was being subjected to a 'witch hunt'. He said the way the allegations were being reported was despicable. Men were being treated as guilty before being proven innocent – they were not being treated fairly.

He continued that he could see no proof of wrongdoing. “There may be things that have been done, a hand on a knee. Fine, you know, 15 years ago that may have been acceptable where it's not today”.

Then we have journalist Peter Hitchens trying to compare sexual harassment to militant Islam. The headline of his piece in the Mail on Sunday read: “What will women gain from all this squawking about sex pests? A niqab”.

He tried to argue that in eradicating the harassment of women and bringing back what he termed 'restrain and manners' we would be moving away from a liberated society and so closer to the ideals of militant Islamists.

Similarly Charles Moore's column in the Sunday Telegraph chose to mock the women who have spoken out rather than support them. The headline to his column read “This scandal shows that women are now on top. I pray they share power with men, not crush us.” He equates the sex scandal – which in his words “strangely contains very little sex” – as a plot by women to seize power from men.

Whilst on this week's edition of BBC panel show 'Have I got News for You', guest host Jo Brand felt compelled to stand up, as the only woman on the panel, to the men who persisted in downplaying the claims of sexual harassment.

Responding to a headline about an MP taking his personal trainer to the cinema, journalist Ian Hislop said “some of this is not high-level crime, is it, compared to Putin or Trump”. To which Jo Brand responded that it doesn't have to be high level crime for women to feel under siege in somewhere like the House of Commons. She continued: “Actually, women, if you're constantly being harassed, even in a small way, that builds up and that wears you down.”

What has certainly been demonstrated by all these male reactions to the allegations of sexual harassment, and worse, at Westminster is the lack of understanding of what women are actually fighting for.

This is not about a power struggle to completely gazump men and take over Parliament. This is about women being able to go into work each day without having to put up with endless sexist comments and wandering hands. This is a culture which has existed for far too long in workplaces where the number of men exceeds women and it is time for it to stop.

Men's reactions of outrage at being 'victimised', coupled with mocking laughter, are contradictory and seem to display the level of confusion they share over why women are calling for this change in the first place.

For men like Sir Roger Gale this has obviously always been a part of working life, it's how male bosses have interacted with their female staff for decades. Men seem to be trying to work out how they are going to interact with women when they can't resort to bawdy comments and a grab of a knee - and their minds are blank.

What these men also don't seem to realise, still, is that this culture of small but persistent harassments is inextricably linked to what they like to see as the incidents of 'high crime', the actual 'sex' in the term sexual harassment.

If a culture of men demeaning women on a regular basis through words and unwanted touches continues then there will also continue to exist a culture which too often turns a blind eye and tries to hush up the more serious allegations of sexual abuse and rape.

Make it possible for a woman to be given exactly the same level of respect, the same ability to go about her workplace unbothered by the opposite sex as men, then you start dealing with the very core of the problem which leads to men on a power trip taking young party activists back to their hotel rooms and raping them.

That's why a hand on the knee is never a laughing matter. That is why this cannot be dismissed as a 'witch hunt'. This is about redressing a severe disbalance between the sexes, which in the words of Labour MP Harriet Harman is 'long overdue'.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Bake Off style icon and a feline emblem of women's emancipation

The world of British politics has been dominated by the wave of sexual allegations pouring out of Westminster this week. So much so, there has been hardly any talk of Brexit. Perhaps we have left. Has anyone noticed a lack of hummus on the shelves of Tesco? But I, rather unfeelingly, digress.
MPs across all political parties have received accusations of a sexual nature against them, ranging from inappropriate comments and misplaced hands to sexual assault and rape. Prime Minister Theresa May has pledged to unite with all other party leaders next week to discuss what must be done to clamp down on this behaviour and deal with the current allegations appropriately.
Of course there have been numerous critics - those who believe we are in some way being unfair to male MPs by bringing these sexual transgressions to the fore. That a man will never be able to chat a woman up in a bar again if we persist in allowing yet another male-dominated area of society to be exposed as misogynistic and …

Older women are missing the point when they say millennials need to 'toughen up' in the face of sexual abuse

It takes a certain type of woman to come out during what can only be seen as a revolutionary time for women's rights and complain. But that is exactly what a number of older, prominent female figures have done since the sex scandal broke at Westminster and it leaves me puzzling, in the most colloquial of terms, 'whose side are they actually on'?
The pervasive idea amongst the women I refer to is that what is going on in the House of Commons as we speak is nothing but a moral panic led by the millennials. They claim that it all comes down to the younger women, who make up much of the MP's staff, not being tough enough to fend off the comments and misplaced hands of their bosses.
They further claim this is some kind of 'millennial revenge' by younger women who carry around with them a sense of disgust towards anyone over 40. Furthermore, they say, women of their generation had a far more robust attitude to men behaving badly, compared to the 'fragile' …

MP's vote on Brexit is a 'con', Johnson's apology a sop, but Theresa May's condemnation of Russia was a triumph

It has been called a 'staggering climbdown' by some but the truth of the matter is, the Government's 11th hour decision to allow Parliament a vote on the Brexit deal is just another example of Tory trickery.
David Davis, the Brexit Secretary, announced yesterday (Monday) that the final Brexit Withdrawal Bill would be presented to the House of Commons as an Act of Parliament which could be voted on in good time before we leave the European Union.
This was initially seen as a major victory on the part of Labour MPs and Tory rebels who have been calling for several months for Parliament to have their say on the Brexit deal. Davis had previously said there would not be an opportunity for MPs to vote as they anticipated work on the deal would be going on until the last minute before exiting.
But alas the devil is always in the detail and it quickly emerged that whilst MPs will be able to vote on the deal, they will not be able to have any say in the case of a no deal Brexit – …