Skip to main content

Review of the Week - Weinstein's dressing gown, Trump's right royal snubbing and the fabulous Emma Thompson

The news has been saturated this week with nauseating revelations of how Harvey Weinstein abused his power as a top Hollywood producer over a period of decades.

From stolen kisses and requests for massages to accusations of rape, actresses have been coming forward in droves since Ashley Judd came out in the New York Times last weekend saying she had been sexually abused at the hands of Weinstein.

Gwyneth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie are some of the big names coming forward to say they were taken advantage of by Weinstein as up-and-coming actresses but had felt too fearful of losing their jobs to speak out.

The latest on the story is both the London Metropolitan and New York police are investigating accusations of sexual abuse on their respective sides of the pond but a big question mark still hangs over whether Weinstein will face a criminal conviction due to the lack of evidence. Surely Weinstein's dressing gown bears the best witness.

However said dressing gown was unavailable for comment as it is enjoying a relaxing vacation with Weinstein who has been checked into a luxurious rehab in Arizona to get over his 'sex addiction'.

Not holding back is British actress Emma Thompson who has spoken eloquently and honestly about how Weinstein is the tip of the iceberg in an industry made up of 'many men' who 'interfere' with women. She threw out any suggestion Weinstein was a sex addict and said there was a real problem with excessive masculinity – a problem the man who held the top job in the world also shared, she added.

Donald Trump is a man very much guilty of interference with women - but his actions appear to be going unchecked. Indeed, despite the revelations last year he thought it completely acceptable to grab women by their most private parts he was voted in as President of the United States rather than made to face any legal recompense.

A man who does not face up to any criticism of his actions, simply labelling it 'fake news', Trump will probably fail to see the parallel between himself and Harvey Weinstein. However, if we go on Emma Thompson's well-thought-out definition of what makes for a male predator – the fact that it doesn't have to be several interferences, it can just be one – then Donald Trump is unequivocally as guilty as Weinstein.

We can rule out any denting of the man's ego, however, over the fact all pomp and ceremony has been taken out of his state visit to Britain at the beginning of next year. Trump had apparently asked for a carriage ride down the Mall, golf at Balmoral and tea with the Queen at Buckingham Palace.

Instead, due to the protest sparked when Theresa May invited Trump on a state visit shortly after his inauguration, everything has been scaled down to a 'working visit' which will involve opening the new London embassy in Battersea.

Trump will no doubt address any accusations Britain is showing how much it dislikes him as yet more 'fake news'.

In Blightly, Brexit has shuddered and stalled over the government's inability to come to any compromise agreement with the EU. The government is being forced to go back to the drawing board to make a host of amendments to its withdrawal bill and Chancellor Philip Hammond is being made to carry the can, due to his 'pessimistic attitude'. An attitude shared by much of the British public then.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has made the wise political move of distancing himself from the mess by declaring if there was a referendum tomorrow he would vote remain. This follows Theresa May's refusal to answer the same question, but in so doing made it very clear she would vote remain as well. Maybe we should get Emma Thompson's opinion on Brexit. She is the only person in this country talking any sense.


Popular posts from this blog

A Bake Off style icon and a feline emblem of women's emancipation

The world of British politics has been dominated by the wave of sexual allegations pouring out of Westminster this week. So much so, there has been hardly any talk of Brexit. Perhaps we have left. Has anyone noticed a lack of hummus on the shelves of Tesco? But I, rather unfeelingly, digress.
MPs across all political parties have received accusations of a sexual nature against them, ranging from inappropriate comments and misplaced hands to sexual assault and rape. Prime Minister Theresa May has pledged to unite with all other party leaders next week to discuss what must be done to clamp down on this behaviour and deal with the current allegations appropriately.
Of course there have been numerous critics - those who believe we are in some way being unfair to male MPs by bringing these sexual transgressions to the fore. That a man will never be able to chat a woman up in a bar again if we persist in allowing yet another male-dominated area of society to be exposed as misogynistic and …

Older women are missing the point when they say millennials need to 'toughen up' in the face of sexual abuse

It takes a certain type of woman to come out during what can only be seen as a revolutionary time for women's rights and complain. But that is exactly what a number of older, prominent female figures have done since the sex scandal broke at Westminster and it leaves me puzzling, in the most colloquial of terms, 'whose side are they actually on'?
The pervasive idea amongst the women I refer to is that what is going on in the House of Commons as we speak is nothing but a moral panic led by the millennials. They claim that it all comes down to the younger women, who make up much of the MP's staff, not being tough enough to fend off the comments and misplaced hands of their bosses.
They further claim this is some kind of 'millennial revenge' by younger women who carry around with them a sense of disgust towards anyone over 40. Furthermore, they say, women of their generation had a far more robust attitude to men behaving badly, compared to the 'fragile' …

MP's vote on Brexit is a 'con', Johnson's apology a sop, but Theresa May's condemnation of Russia was a triumph

It has been called a 'staggering climbdown' by some but the truth of the matter is, the Government's 11th hour decision to allow Parliament a vote on the Brexit deal is just another example of Tory trickery.
David Davis, the Brexit Secretary, announced yesterday (Monday) that the final Brexit Withdrawal Bill would be presented to the House of Commons as an Act of Parliament which could be voted on in good time before we leave the European Union.
This was initially seen as a major victory on the part of Labour MPs and Tory rebels who have been calling for several months for Parliament to have their say on the Brexit deal. Davis had previously said there would not be an opportunity for MPs to vote as they anticipated work on the deal would be going on until the last minute before exiting.
But alas the devil is always in the detail and it quickly emerged that whilst MPs will be able to vote on the deal, they will not be able to have any say in the case of a no deal Brexit – …