Skip to main content

This week's must-have purchase – the ski jacket

It is absolutely time to think about that winter coat purchase. Halloween and bonfire night are just around the corner and the clocks go back this weekend.

The coat is perhaps the most emotive of clothing purchases. Many of us can catalogue time through what coat we were wearing in a particular year. Whether it was the coat we wore to school - mud splattered from running through puddles and smeared with tuck shop food - the ditching of a coat altogether during our teenage years as we make our first frost-bitten rebellion against being told what to do, or that most precious of coats brought with our first pay packet, which came with pom poms, faux fur and sequins because it was all about impact not style.

Whether we decide to invest in a coat which will see us through the years or see the annual purchase of a new coat as a special winter treat, the coat is our outer-most layer of expression through the chillest months and therefore perhaps tells onlookers the most about us.

The fashion experts would not have it so – for them it is all about the trends and the biggest coat trend this winter 2017 is the ski jacket.

We're not talking here about a puffer jacket or a nice down coat by the way, we are talking about the sort of jacket you would actually wear skiing. Fashion mags have even come up with a catch-line - “from the slopes to the streets”.

Surely this is the ultimate 'fool them into thinking you are someone you are not' type of garment. Simply apply fake tan on your face everywhere but around your eyes to mimic those ski goggles and you can absolutely pretend you have just got back from a ski holiday in the Swiss Alps.

Ideal if a ski holiday is slightly out of budget, especially as the ski jackets themselves can see you shelling out several hundred pounds. My favourite has to be the ski jacket from Moncler which comes complete with Brethil ski-scene print and at a whopping £1,085 I would like to think it would also magically transform the wearer into a fantastic skier.

Talking about the ultra rich, the EU – remember them, the ones we are trying to get divorced from – have launched an inquiry into a British government scheme that is helping multinational firms pay less tax.

Which supreme villain would have introduced such an underhand scheme I hear you ask – well it turns out it was brought in by then Tory Chancellor George Osbourne in 2011 and happily passed through Parliament. The tax avoidance scam – sorry scheme – allows multinational companies resident in the UK to lower their tax bills by shifting some of their taxable income to an off-shore corporation known as a Controlled Foreign Company (CFC).

CFC's are not illegal but the EU Commission believes the UK set-up breaks EU competition rules by giving an unfair advantage to multinationals compared to British companies without foreign subsidiaries.

HMRC has revealed this week that multinationals avoided paying £5.8billion in taxes in 2016, 50 per cent more than government forecasts and this figure does not even include losses to CFC's.

EU officials do not know whether they will get their investigation completed by March 2019 when the UK is due to leave the EU and whilst the Commission wants all outstanding investigations to be completed under EU law even if the UK has already left, the UK has still not decided what will happen with ongoing state aid investigations and pending European court cases – quelle surprise.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has voiced concerns the Tory's are looking to make Britain into the ultimate tax haven once we leave the EU and the more cynical may view the rush to leave the EU as tied up with preventing this tax-avoidance investigation from reaching completion.


Popular posts from this blog

A Bake Off style icon and a feline emblem of women's emancipation

The world of British politics has been dominated by the wave of sexual allegations pouring out of Westminster this week. So much so, there has been hardly any talk of Brexit. Perhaps we have left. Has anyone noticed a lack of hummus on the shelves of Tesco? But I, rather unfeelingly, digress.
MPs across all political parties have received accusations of a sexual nature against them, ranging from inappropriate comments and misplaced hands to sexual assault and rape. Prime Minister Theresa May has pledged to unite with all other party leaders next week to discuss what must be done to clamp down on this behaviour and deal with the current allegations appropriately.
Of course there have been numerous critics - those who believe we are in some way being unfair to male MPs by bringing these sexual transgressions to the fore. That a man will never be able to chat a woman up in a bar again if we persist in allowing yet another male-dominated area of society to be exposed as misogynistic and …

Older women are missing the point when they say millennials need to 'toughen up' in the face of sexual abuse

It takes a certain type of woman to come out during what can only be seen as a revolutionary time for women's rights and complain. But that is exactly what a number of older, prominent female figures have done since the sex scandal broke at Westminster and it leaves me puzzling, in the most colloquial of terms, 'whose side are they actually on'?
The pervasive idea amongst the women I refer to is that what is going on in the House of Commons as we speak is nothing but a moral panic led by the millennials. They claim that it all comes down to the younger women, who make up much of the MP's staff, not being tough enough to fend off the comments and misplaced hands of their bosses.
They further claim this is some kind of 'millennial revenge' by younger women who carry around with them a sense of disgust towards anyone over 40. Furthermore, they say, women of their generation had a far more robust attitude to men behaving badly, compared to the 'fragile' …

MP's vote on Brexit is a 'con', Johnson's apology a sop, but Theresa May's condemnation of Russia was a triumph

It has been called a 'staggering climbdown' by some but the truth of the matter is, the Government's 11th hour decision to allow Parliament a vote on the Brexit deal is just another example of Tory trickery.
David Davis, the Brexit Secretary, announced yesterday (Monday) that the final Brexit Withdrawal Bill would be presented to the House of Commons as an Act of Parliament which could be voted on in good time before we leave the European Union.
This was initially seen as a major victory on the part of Labour MPs and Tory rebels who have been calling for several months for Parliament to have their say on the Brexit deal. Davis had previously said there would not be an opportunity for MPs to vote as they anticipated work on the deal would be going on until the last minute before exiting.
But alas the devil is always in the detail and it quickly emerged that whilst MPs will be able to vote on the deal, they will not be able to have any say in the case of a no deal Brexit – …