Skip to main content

We have a problem with...Jacob Rees-Mogg

The Tory backbencher for North East Somerset has stirred up the pot with a series of contentious views this week, on all things from abortion and same-sex marriage to food banks and the morning-after pill.

Mr Rees-Mogg, a father of six, is on record as being anti-abortion, even in the case of rape or incest, and anti-gay marriage. In his eyes, the fact he is a Catholic justifies these views.
He similarly has described the move to make the morning-after pill more easily available to women as 'a great sadness'.

But what we all need to remember before we too quickly dismiss Mr Rees-Mogg's views as utter twaddle in 2017 Britain, is this man is one of the favourites to replace Theresa May as Prime Minister. In fact he is absolute favourite amongst Tory grass roots members.

And if there is any doubt over what kind of Prime Minister this man would be - there are his comments on food banks. Talking to LBC Radio he said he found the increased use of food banks 'uplifting'. He said it revealed the charitable support people were prepared to voluntarily give to their fellow citizens.

When confronted with figures that showed last year food banks had been used by more people than ever before, he said that was because the Conservatives had made people aware that food banks existed, unlike the previous Labour government.

Nothing to do with the number of public sector jobs being slashed and more and more families living in poverty then.

There was a time when we used to laugh at Toad of Toad Hall, lager swigging, Nigel Farage. Look where that got us – Brexit.
We chortled over perma-tanned reality television star Donald Trump and his little hands. Then he was elected leader of the most powerful country in the world.

There is a pattern emerging here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Bake Off style icon and a feline emblem of women's emancipation

The world of British politics has been dominated by the wave of sexual allegations pouring out of Westminster this week. So much so, there has been hardly any talk of Brexit. Perhaps we have left. Has anyone noticed a lack of hummus on the shelves of Tesco? But I, rather unfeelingly, digress.
MPs across all political parties have received accusations of a sexual nature against them, ranging from inappropriate comments and misplaced hands to sexual assault and rape. Prime Minister Theresa May has pledged to unite with all other party leaders next week to discuss what must be done to clamp down on this behaviour and deal with the current allegations appropriately.
Of course there have been numerous critics - those who believe we are in some way being unfair to male MPs by bringing these sexual transgressions to the fore. That a man will never be able to chat a woman up in a bar again if we persist in allowing yet another male-dominated area of society to be exposed as misogynistic and …

Older women are missing the point when they say millennials need to 'toughen up' in the face of sexual abuse

It takes a certain type of woman to come out during what can only be seen as a revolutionary time for women's rights and complain. But that is exactly what a number of older, prominent female figures have done since the sex scandal broke at Westminster and it leaves me puzzling, in the most colloquial of terms, 'whose side are they actually on'?
The pervasive idea amongst the women I refer to is that what is going on in the House of Commons as we speak is nothing but a moral panic led by the millennials. They claim that it all comes down to the younger women, who make up much of the MP's staff, not being tough enough to fend off the comments and misplaced hands of their bosses.
They further claim this is some kind of 'millennial revenge' by younger women who carry around with them a sense of disgust towards anyone over 40. Furthermore, they say, women of their generation had a far more robust attitude to men behaving badly, compared to the 'fragile' …

MP's vote on Brexit is a 'con', Johnson's apology a sop, but Theresa May's condemnation of Russia was a triumph

It has been called a 'staggering climbdown' by some but the truth of the matter is, the Government's 11th hour decision to allow Parliament a vote on the Brexit deal is just another example of Tory trickery.
David Davis, the Brexit Secretary, announced yesterday (Monday) that the final Brexit Withdrawal Bill would be presented to the House of Commons as an Act of Parliament which could be voted on in good time before we leave the European Union.
This was initially seen as a major victory on the part of Labour MPs and Tory rebels who have been calling for several months for Parliament to have their say on the Brexit deal. Davis had previously said there would not be an opportunity for MPs to vote as they anticipated work on the deal would be going on until the last minute before exiting.
But alas the devil is always in the detail and it quickly emerged that whilst MPs will be able to vote on the deal, they will not be able to have any say in the case of a no deal Brexit – …